Yasemin Turan1, Zehra Kocaağa2, Hikmet Koçyiğit2, Alev Gürgan2, Korhan Barış Bayram2, Serdar İpek2

1Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Aydın, Turkey
2Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Kliniği, İzmir, Turkey

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, disease activity, fatigue, quality of life, radiological involvement

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate fatigue and its relationship with disease activity, radiological findings and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Materials and Methods: 41 patients who were diagnosed as RA according to criteria of ACR and 38 healthy controls were enrolled to this study. Patients were asked to record the severity of rest pain (Visual Analog Scale) and duration of morning stiffness. Fatigue was evaluated by the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) test. Disease activity and quality of life were assessed respectively with DAS-28 and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Radiologic involvement was evaluated according to modified Larsen's grading system.

Results: The mean age of patient and control groups were 50.9±13.4 years and 50±10.1 years, respectively. Two groups were similar with respect age (p=0.744). The median MAF total score was higher in patients with RA (38.5, min-max: 4-50) than in control subjects (22.5, min-max: 0-42) (p<0.001). There were significant correlations between MAF and DAS-28 scores (r=0.478, p=0.004), rest pain (r=0.491, p=0.001), ACR functional scale (r=0.563, p<0.001) and four dimensions of SF36; physical role (r=-0.504, p=0.014), bodily pain (r=-0.416, p=0.048), vitality (r=-0.522, p=0.011), emotional role (r=-0.523, p=0.011).

Conclusion: Fatigue symptom may be quite disabling for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It is affected by disease activity and pain but not by disease duration and radiologic score. Therefore, it is concluded that fatigue is essentially related with disease activity rather than the chronic inflammatory process in RA. (Turk J Rheumatol 2010; 25: 63-7)